 |
| iran force |
iran force force Middle East is currently witnessing one of the most turbulent and defining geopolitical shifts in modern history. With the ongoing, devastating conflict in Gaza and the recent escalations involving unprecedented direct military confrontations between Iran and Israel, the global Muslim community finds itself at a profound crossroads. Across social media platforms, living rooms, and community gatherings, a heated debate is unfolding: Should Muslims support Iran in the current geopolitical crisis?
On one side, there is the undeniable reality of the oppressed Palestinians who have been enduring unimaginable brutality. On the other side stands Iran, a nation that has openly defied and militarily challenged the Israeli occupation. However, for the majority of the global Muslim population—who adhere to the Sunni tradition—supporting Iran brings forth a complex theological dilemma.
To navigate this delicate issue, we must analyze the situation through two distinct lenses: the strict theological boundaries of Islamic belief (Aqeedah) and the overarching Islamic principles of geopolitical justice and strategic alignment.
The Core Dilemma: Theological and Ideological Differences
To understand the hesitation of many Muslims regarding Iran, we must first look at the profound theological differences that exist between mainstream Sunni Islam and the Twelver Shia ideology, which serves as the foundational doctrine of the Iranian state. Iran is a Shia-majority country, and its entire leadership structure, from the Supreme Leader to the President, is rooted in Shia theology.
For Sunni Muslims, the Companions of the Prophet Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him)—known as the Sahaba—are the absolute gold standard of faith, loyalty, and righteousness. They are the individuals who sacrificed their wealth, families, and lives to protect the Prophet and spread the message of Islam. The Quran itself praises them in numerous verses, stating that Allah is pleased with them and they are pleased with Him. Loving and respecting the Sahaba is an integral pillar of Sunni Aqeedah (creed).
However, historical and theological records show that the Shia perspective on the Sahaba is drastically different. According to their core doctrines, they hold a deeply negative view of the vast majority of the Prophet’s companions. In fact, many Shia traditions claim that after the demise of the Prophet (PBUH), almost all the companions deviated from the right path, except for a very small group—often cited as only four or five individuals, such as Salman al-Farsi, Ammar ibn Yasir, Miqdad, and Abu Dharr al-Ghifari (May Allah be pleased with them).
Tragically, this ideological stance leads some extremists within their ranks to disrespect, vilify, or even curse some of the most prominent and beloved figures in Islamic history, including Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, and the Prophet's beloved wife, Aisha (May Allah be pleased with them all).
From an Islamic standpoint, holding malice towards the Sahaba is a severe deviation. Because of this monumental theological gap, Sunni Muslims cannot, under any circumstances, endorse or embrace the religious ideology of the Iranian state. The boundary of faith is clear, and on matters of Aqeedah, there is zero room for compromise.
The Principle of Justice: The Oppressor (Zalim) vs. The Oppressed (Mazlum)
If the theological differences are so massive and uncompromising, why are so many Muslims around the world applauding Iran’s recent military pushback against Israel? Does this make them hypocrites?
Absolutely not. The answer lies in another foundational pillar of Islam: the absolute pursuit of justice and the divine mandate to stand with the oppressed (Mazlum) against the oppressor (Zalim).
Islam is a profoundly pragmatic and justice-oriented religion. It teaches us that injustice must be opposed, regardless of who is committing it or who is fighting against it. Currently, the state of Israel is carrying out what many international human rights organizations and global citizens recognize as a brutal genocide against the Palestinian people in Gaza. The mass destruction of hospitals, schools, and civilian infrastructure, along with the tragic loss of tens of thousands of innocent lives, represents the highest peak of modern-day tyranny (Zulm).
In this specific geopolitical scenario, the Palestinians are the ultimate Mazlum (the oppressed), and Israel is the undisputed Zalim (the oppressor). When Iran decides to launch a military strike against this oppressor to deter further genocide, they are taking an action that aligns with the protection of the oppressed.
A fundamental Islamic principle dictates that if a party stands up against a tyrant to defend the innocent, their action can be supported strategically, even if we fundamentally disagree with their religious beliefs. Supporting a specific action against a mutual enemy does not require signing a contract of theological agreement.
Lessons from History: The Wisdom of Surah Ar-Rum
If we look back into the glorious history of Islam and the divine revelations of the Quran, we find a perfect historical parallel that beautifully resolves this modern-day dilemma.
During the Meccan period of the Prophet Muhammad’s (PBUH) life, a massive global conflict was taking place between two superpowers: the Byzantine Empire (the Romans, who were Christians) and the Sassanid Empire (the Persians, who were Zoroastrian fire-worshippers).
When the Persians initially defeated the Romans, the polytheists (Mushrikeen) of Mecca rejoiced. They felt a sense of ideological kinship with the Persians because both groups were idolaters/polytheists. Conversely, the early Muslims were deeply saddened by the defeat of the Romans. Why? Because the Romans, despite their altered theology (believing in the Trinity and considering Jesus as the Son of God, which is completely rejected in Islam), were Ahl al-Kitab (People of the Book). They believed in divine revelation, prophets, and the Day of Judgment, making them relatively closer to the Muslims than the fire-worshipping Persians.
In response to this event, Allah revealed the opening verses of Surah Ar-Rum (The Romans), prophesying that the Romans would soon be victorious again, and "on that day, the believers will rejoice."
This Quranic precedent provides a massive geopolitical framework for Muslims today. The Sahaba rejoiced at the victory of the Christian Romans over the Persians. Did this mean the Sahaba endorsed the Christian belief in the Trinity? Absolutely not! They were celebrating a strategic and geopolitical victory of a group that was relatively closer to the truth over a group that was further engulfed in darkness.
Similarly, in today’s context, Israel represents an aggressive occupying force committing ethnic cleansing. If Iran—despite its theological flaws regarding the Sahaba—takes a bold military stance against this occupying force, Muslims can strategically appreciate that specific action. Rejoicing in the deterrence of Israel does not make one a Shia, just as the Sahaba rejoicing for the Romans did not make them Christians.
Strategic Alignment vs. Ideological Endorsement
It is highly crucial for the modern Muslim to separate strategic alignment from ideological endorsement. We are living in an era of complex geopolitics, and maintaining a simplistic, black-and-white worldview will only leave the Ummah isolated and intellectually paralyzed.
Here is the balanced formula for a politically conscious Muslim today:
- Firmness in Faith: We must remain absolutely firm in our Sunni Aqeedah. We must teach our children the true history and honor of the beloved Sahaba, rejecting any ideology that disrespects them.
- Support for the Action: We can conditionally support any nation, including Iran, specifically when their actions help alleviate the suffering of the Palestinians and strike fear into the hearts of the oppressors.
- Intellectual Maturity: We must realize that in global politics, the enemy of my enemy can be a temporary strategic ally. Cheering for a missile that strikes an Israeli military base is a stance for humanity and justice; it is not a validation of Tehran's religious export.
Conclusion
In conclusion, should Muslims support Iran in the current conflict? The answer is nuanced but clear. Muslims should support the actions that disrupt tyranny and aid the oppressed people of Palestine. If Iran is the one executing those actions, we acknowledge the strategic benefit of their resistance without compromising a single atom of our theological beliefs.
Islam is a religion of profound balance. It teaches us to hate the sin but recognize the broader geopolitical realities. We can completely reject Shia theology regarding the noble Companions of the Prophet, while simultaneously understanding that in the fight for the liberation of Al-Aqsa and the survival of Gaza, any hand that strikes the oppressor is a hand that serves the immediate cause of justice. Let us remain united for the oppressed, firm in our pure faith, and wise in our understanding of global politics.
0 মন্তব্যসমূহ